MTU 135, X-Men Vs. Hulk, X&AF2 mini series

Discuss chronologies for characters in the main "Marvel Universe"

Moderators: Col_Fury, michel, Arthur, Somebody, StrayLamb

PunyBanner
Hero
Hero
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 8:53 pm

MTU 135, X-Men Vs. Hulk, X&AF2 mini series

Post by PunyBanner »

Hello all, I've been reading the Uncanny X-Men Omnibus Vol. 3 (which includes issues 154-175 of Uncanny X-Men plus the Wolverine mini-series) and I've noticed that the chronologies for the X-Men characters is rather messy during this time. Specifically the placements for MTU 135, X-Men Vs. Hulk, and the X-Men/Alpha Flight mini-series.

One problem is Wolverine being in Japan. He is clearly there from issues 169-172 because Colossus comments how the X-Men have not seen him in a long time when they go to Japan in 172, yet MTU 135 is placed between 171 and 172.

The other big problem is that Wolverine clearly meets Lockheed for the first time in 172 yet he would have met Lockheed already in XvHulk and the Alpha Flight mini-series according to the chronology.

I do have a suggestion for fixing these discrepancies. There is a week long gap in 173 right before Wolverine and Mariko's wedding. We could place MTU 135, XvH, and X&AF2 there. I know everyone is in Japan at this time but it's possible they went back to the states for some reason. Professor X asked Kitty to babysit some kids in MTU 135, maybe they flew back for this reason and the other X-Men, including Wolverine, decided to tag along. Maybe they went back to help Xavier get to Japan since he doesn't show up until the wedding. Also, Storm's new mohawk doesn't debut until the wedding. Maybe she took a week to think it over since she does not have the mohawk in MTU 135, XvH, and X&AF2. And maybe Rogue stayed in Japan with Mariko which explains her absence from those issues. I'm just trying to make the best logical sense of this but the whole Lockheed and Japan thing really bugs me. Any thoughts?
JephYork
Comic Pro
Comic Pro
Posts: 4657
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 10:10 pm
Location: Boston

Re: MTU 135, X-Men Vs. Hulk, X&AF2 mini series

Post by JephYork »

Unfortunately, these issues are messy no matter where they're placed. Their current positions are the result of a LOT of poking and experimenting and shifting around -- and over two years of discussion, this is the best balancing act we could all come up with.

I don't think an off-the-cuff "hey let's pretend they all just interrupted Wolverine's wedding pre-party and flew halfway around the globe so Kitty could babysit" suggestion addresses all the complex chronology points these issues affect. (And why would Prof. X *ask* Kitty to babysit if she was currently halfway around the globe? Surely he knows other babysitters.)

Here's some discussion about the issues -- I know there's more but can't find it right now.

Spirited discussion on X-Men vs. Hulk from 2009
X-Men/Alpha Flight v2 discussed here
X/AF is also discussed here while talking about M/GN #5

-Jeph!
PunyBanner
Hero
Hero
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 8:53 pm

Re: MTU 135, X-Men Vs. Hulk, X&AF2 mini series

Post by PunyBanner »

I guess I'm just trying to pick the lesser of two evils. Coming up with an explanation for why they went back to the states during the week long gap in 173 (the babysitting thing doesn't have to be the reason) seems to be more plausible than figuring out why Wolverine doesn't remember Lockheed. I'm just basing everything off of the dialogue and reactions of the characters (not seeing Wolverine in a long time, Wolverine asking who Lockheed is).
JephYork
Comic Pro
Comic Pro
Posts: 4657
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 10:10 pm
Location: Boston

Re: MTU 135, X-Men Vs. Hulk, X&AF2 mini series

Post by JephYork »

We also tried to pick the lesser of two evils. ;)

I think we rationalized the Wolvie/Lockheed thing off as Wolverine saying "what is that thing doing here/out in public?", not "what is that thing?" Besides, this is far from the first time that two characters have had multiple first meetings thanks to continuity-implant stories or general sloppiness...

Hell, Tony Stark doesn't recognize Mary Jane Watson in the current Invincible Iron Man series, despite them living together in Avengers Tower for months during the JMS Amazing Spider-Man run. These things happen.

-Jeph!
Michael
Chronology Guru
Chronology Guru
Posts: 1345
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2009 10:41 am

Re: MTU 135, X-Men Vs. Hulk, X&AF2 mini series

Post by Michael »

Isn't that because of the spell Strange used to make people forget Peter was Spider-Man?
JephYork
Comic Pro
Comic Pro
Posts: 4657
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 10:10 pm
Location: Boston

Re: MTU 135, X-Men Vs. Hulk, X&AF2 mini series

Post by JephYork »

I doubt it. Tony should still remember that Peter was his employee, and that Peter and his wife lived in the tower.

Over on tumblr, Tom Brevoort's explanation for is "do you...remember the names of everybody who was in your fifth grade class? You went to school with them all every day for months! Same thing. Tony Stark interacts with a lot of people in his life, and from his POV, Mary Jane and even Peter wouldn’t have been so important or life-changing that he’d necessarily remember everything about them years later."

But let's not get sidetracked. ;)

Did the X-Men travel to Japan for Wolverine's wedding -- then, for some reason, all travel home again for a few days and hang around like nothing's going on, before traveling right back, halfway around the planet for a third time, for the ceremony? Including Wolverine, the groom-to-be? This would be after the Silver Samurai's attack on the team...

What possible rationale would they have for this? (Could Rogue's injuries have required medical attention from the mansion's specialized sickbay? She absorbed Wolvie's healing factor in #173 so I'd guess not, but it sure beats "Prof. X wanted Kitty to babysit.")

More importantly -- what domino effect would this suggested change have on the current chronologies? Right now the current delicate placement affects everything from the Hulk to the Defenders...
User avatar
Somebody
Director
Director
Posts: 3387
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Scotland
Contact:

Re: MTU 135, X-Men Vs. Hulk, X&AF2 mini series

Post by Somebody »

JephYork wrote:I doubt it. Tony should still remember that Peter was his employee, and that Peter and his wife lived in the tower.

Over on tumblr, Tom Brevoort's explanation for is "do you...remember the names of everybody who was in your fifth grade class? You went to school with them all every day for months! Same thing. Tony Stark interacts with a lot of people in his life, and from his POV, Mary Jane and even Peter wouldn’t have been so important or life-changing that he’d necessarily remember everything about them years later."
Wouldn't a better explanation have been "Stark was mindwiped all the way back to the start of Ellis' Iron Man run at the end of Dark Reign"?
PunyBanner
Hero
Hero
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 8:53 pm

Re: MTU 135, X-Men Vs. Hulk, X&AF2 mini series

Post by PunyBanner »

Why do we need to come up with a rationale for them coming back to the states? We don't see every minute of their lives. There was a week gap and anything could have happened to make them come back. Who knows? We don't need to explain it. I personally feel it's a better fit. Not perfect, but better. Also, I think X-Men Vs. Hulk should be non-canon due to the problems it creates and I don't think it is ever mentioned in any other comic or followed up on. (Speaking of canon, why in the world is Star Trek/X-Men considered canon?? They mention Star Trek being a TV show in the Marvel Universe!! Is it mentioned in a canon comic somewhere?)
Jason Doty
Chronology Guru
Chronology Guru
Posts: 9594
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 6:24 pm
Location: Milton, Florida

Re: MTU 135, X-Men Vs. Hulk, X&AF2 mini series

Post by Jason Doty »

PunyBanner wrote
(Speaking of canon, why in the world is Star Trek/X-Men considered canon?? They mention Star Trek being a TV show in the Marvel Universe!!
It's a Universe to Universe crossover. It should be included. Not to mention it is referenced in the handbook entries.

PunnyBanner wrote
Also, I think X-Men Vs. Hulk should be non-canon due to the problems it creates and I don't think it is ever mentioned in any other comic or followed up on.
Who is to say it won't be? Look at the Spider-Verse Crossover, think of the backtracking involved in adding Spider-Ham, which also led to a missed appearance of Howard the Duck (a character who is a 100% 616 mainstay). If it's Marvel we should make our best effort to accommodate it.

If we start down the road of tossing things that don't match up perfectly, or are a tough fit, we would be tossing many canon series in favor of others.
PunyBanner
Hero
Hero
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 8:53 pm

Re: MTU 135, X-Men Vs. Hulk, X&AF2 mini series

Post by PunyBanner »

It's a Universe to Universe crossover. It should be included. Not to mention it is referenced in the handbook entries.
The handbooks used to mention X-Men: First Class and Wolverine: First Class but that has been omitted in later updates. Do any X-Men characters in the Star Trek crossover mention that they are meeting characters from a TV show?
Jason Doty
Chronology Guru
Chronology Guru
Posts: 9594
Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 6:24 pm
Location: Milton, Florida

Re: MTU 135, X-Men Vs. Hulk, X&AF2 mini series

Post by Jason Doty »

PunyBanner wrote
The handbooks used to mention X-Men: First Class and Wolverine: First Class but that has been omitted in later updates.
Which entries? I just want to check from one to another.
Also, I believe there are a few issues of that series, or maybe just one, that are included in the MCP because of a reference in a present day tale.

Puny Banner wrote
Do any X-Men characters in the Star Trek crossover mention that they are meeting characters from a TV show?
I don't believe so, but since both the Marvel Characters and the Star Trek Characters are both from fictional universes, who knows who plays the fictional characters on a television show called "Star Trek" in the Marvel Universe. A pop culture reference in a comic is just that.

If a kid in the Marvel Universe dresses like Batman on Halloween, does that mean the DC Universe crossovers should be negated or that the DC Universe doesn't exist as a separate fictional universe? I personally don't think so.
PunyBanner
Hero
Hero
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 8:53 pm

Re: MTU 135, X-Men Vs. Hulk, X&AF2 mini series

Post by PunyBanner »

Which entries? I just want to check from one to another.


The big one that comes to mind is the High Evolutionary. His hardcover handbook profile references a Wolverine: First Class story but his later profile in the updated paperback has this story omitted.

I don't believe so, but since both the Marvel Characters and the Star Trek Characters are both from fictional universes, who knows who plays the fictional characters on a television show called "Star Trek" in the Marvel Universe. A pop culture reference in a comic is just that.
I have to disagree. There is a Damage Control comic where the characters talk about Star Trek at great length, mentioning episodes, Captain Kirk, Klingons, even The Next Generation. Unless the X-Men are shocked at meeting TV characters, it really should not be canon. Makes no sense to me personally especially after reading that Damage Control comic.
JephYork
Comic Pro
Comic Pro
Posts: 4657
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 10:10 pm
Location: Boston

Re: MTU 135, X-Men Vs. Hulk, X&AF2 mini series

Post by JephYork »

Fictional universes relate to other fictional universes in weird ways.

DC comic books exist as fiction in the Marvel Universe, and vice versa. And yet, both universes have crossed over multiple times, with some of those stories even being referenced in later (non-crossover) issues. How can Spider-Man read a Superman comic, then meet Superman -- and then have that meeting referenced in "Avengers Forever"?

You, personally, can view those crossovers as non-canon if you choose to. Others can choose to come up with long-winded explanations for the mechanics of how fictional universes interact. (Like, for example, perhaps when two fictional worlds cross over, they are both briefly "re-written" by whatever cosmic forces govern them, so that they no longer recall the other universe as fictional.) Still others can just shrug, accept that they're reading comic books and that *all* of it is fictional, and enjoy the stories for what they are. :)

We've gotten AMAZINGLY sidetracked from your original notion, that you think some stories should occur during the weeklong gap in UXM #173. If you're still interested in trying to argue for that placement, I'd be interested to see how your proposed changes affect other related chronologies (like the Hulk, Alpha Flight, the Defenders, etc etc).

-Jeph!
PunyBanner
Hero
Hero
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 8:53 pm

Re: MTU 135, X-Men Vs. Hulk, X&AF2 mini series

Post by PunyBanner »

Yeah, sorry for bringing up an unrelated topic. As for how my proposed changes affect everything else, I haven't looked into that. I sometimes think about these things and forget about the larger Marvel Universe and how other character's chronologies might be affected. I can check on the Hulk but I don't own any Alpha Flight comics to check thoroughly.
User avatar
StrayLamb
Director
Director
Posts: 2279
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 5:42 am
Location: a sheep paddock, along the Great Eastern Highway

Re: MTU 135, X-Men Vs. Hulk, X&AF2 mini series

Post by StrayLamb »

Sorry to drag this thread up again, but after reading massive amounts of discussion going back to 2009 in the threads, and back to 2003 in the archives, i find we have been left with X-Men vs Hulk in an untenable position for Hulk.

Just as a reminder, it seems to have been settled on that Wolverine must have set up this battle with an intelligent Hulk, who was basically play-acting, in order to teach Colossus a lesson.

To cut a long story short, this issue is placed after X&AF2 for the X-Men and Alpha Flight. This has been placed after AF 4 for Alpha Flight due to a reference to the battles against Tundra and the Master of the World. Various problems with the X-Men, and many discussions on the subject, have caused X&AF2 to be pretty much set in concrete before UX 169. AF 2-4 are enmeshed with FF 259-260. Due to more entanglements between FF 256 & A 233-234, where the Vision becomes incapacitated, the placements for these issues are pretty well fixed and unmovable.

However, XV.H has been fixed to occur immediately after X&AF2, which creates an Excedrin headache, because the Hulk has this placed between IH2 285 & IH@ 12, which occurs much earlier in the timeline. Due to Vision's paralysis in A 233, DEF 123-124 have been placed by necessity before this, and a gap was created in NDEF 125 to accommodate the original Defenders, during which FF 256-260 occurs. Hulk places DEF 122-125 after IH2 286-290, so by everyone else's listings, XV.H should take place between NDEF 125 & IH2 291, but that placement doesn't work by anyone's arguments over the past 11 years since it was released.

Should we review this yet again, or listen to Somebody, who made the following comments back in 2009, and relegate XV.H to the Non-Canon list..
Somebody wrote: Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:31 pmBetween H2 296 and 297 is the ONLY place where this even MIGHT fit, and that involves a crowbar. There *is nowhere else*. If that doesn't fit for the X-Men in a reconcilable way, then "it can't be".
Somebody wrote: Mon Feb 09, 2009 1:46 pmEither it goes between H2 296 and 297, or it goes out.
Out in the Land Down-Under, beneath a rocky outcrop, deep within the back paddock, dwells the Stray Lamb.
Post Reply