So, what's the final take here? Is it :
CYCLOPS
TOS 10
FF 9 <-- DELETE
P8 12 <-- DELETE
CYCLOPS II new
FF 9
CYCLOPS II/SCOTT SUMMERS/"SLYM DAYSPRING" --> CHANGE TO CYCLOPS III
X:EXTRNTD /2 (4:3)-FB-FB
...
CYCLOPS III --> CHANGE TO CYCLOPS IV
UX 395
CYCLOPS V new
P8 12
Cyclops (I)
Moderators: Col_Fury, michel, Arthur, Somebody, StrayLamb
-
- Major Player
- Posts: 259
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2019 12:36 pm
Re: Cyclops (I)
That looks good to me.
Re: Cyclops (I)
So we are disregarding the Punisher Index's claim that the Cyclops from TOS 10 also appeared in P8 12?
Re: Cyclops (I)
I've followed Antonio:
Antonio Gaviño wrote: ↑Mon Nov 14, 2022 12:56 am After taking a closer look, there’s another one-eyed character in P8 12 who is probably the one the Punisher Index refers to as Cyclops, and who resembles the one appearing in TOS 10 with long hear and beard, but it’s unlikely they are the same character because this one is red skinned and not a giant.
Re: Cyclops (I)
If we are assuming that the background character in the Punisher issue being the TOS Cyclops is a misidentification, then they're nameless and shouldn't be listed, no?