Marvel Chronology Project

At least that's what makes sense to me, I don't know what the original rationale was for placing T2 50/3 in the spot that it is currently sitting, but if there is a specific reason I'd be very much interested in knowing why. I was curious about this myself and just checked, and it's placed there be...

Understood. Said proposed change has now been removed.

Now comes the hardest part - going back to the original purpose of this thread and deciphering the Handbook's placements of events. As I wrote way back, I already suspected that many of these events (though they are placed weird) don't conflict with any character's chronologies besides Nightmare sin...

Hey, I've finished talking with the Handbook writer. This first post is just going to be for the entries I wrote for other characters Proposed changes to Doggerel's entry: DOGGEREL NMARE 1 <— ADD NMARE 2 <— ADD NMARE 3 <— ADD NMARE 4 <— ADD OEDGE 7 Source: https://www.marvunapp.com/Appendix/doggerel...

[Removed]

The art in the accompanying panel clearly shows her attacker to be Nightmare. I disagree (that could be an unnamed demon since it's not confirmed) but fine. The problem is that Pluto describes his allies as rulers of dimensions of the dead. Nightmare ISN'T a ruler of a dimension of the dead. I had ...

Sorry for reviving this dead thread, but I'd also like to make the case for the removal of DS2 65-FB from his master list. This will only affect him since it is a flashback. Going through the old chat logs from the MCP, I perfectly understand the reasoning why this was added: Thread 7 Posted: 17 Apr...

Also this: Here's our current chronology of the WHISTLE PIG LIVING TOTEM II/WHISTLE PIG DOCSAM2 1-FB DOCSAM2 1 DOCSAM2 2 DOCSAM2 4/2 DOCSAM2 4 DOCSAM2 5 DOCSAM2 5/2 I'd change it to: LIVING TOTEM II/WHISTLE PIG DOCSAM2 1-FB DOCSAM2 1 DOCSAM2 2 DOCSAM2 4/2 DOCSAM2 5/2 DOCSAM2 4 DOCSAM2 5 DOC SAMSON/D...

This will probably be my last posts on this thread since no one is reading it This thread has been read over 1300 times. :shrug: Perhaps you mean that no one is responding to it. That's usually a good thing. I thought check marks are used to indicate that the proposal is accepted. The checkmark is ...

This will probably be my last posts on this thread since no one is reading it and my proposed changes will probably not get merged. If no one responds it means there are no corrections to be made and the proposals are fine. They will be integrated soon, updates are not done in real time but are don...

Proposed changes to Doggerel's entry:
DOGGEREL
NMARE 1 <— ADD
NMARE 2 <— ADD
NMARE 3 <— ADD
NMARE 4 <— ADD
OEDGE 7

Source: https://www.marvunapp.com/Appendix/dogg ... htmare.htm

This will probably be my last posts on this thread since no one is reading it and my proposed changes will probably not get merged.

So would it be possible to merge my Doggerel request at least, while I'm waiting for the changes to Nightmare's chronology. I asked loki, and he talked to the writer of the original Handbook entry. I'm waiting for his response when loki comes back online (hasn't been spotted in over a month). Here's...

If this is still being discussed, can we at least merge my Doggerel request?
DOGGEREL
NMARE 1
NMARE 2
NMARE 3
NMARE 4
OEDGE 7

Per the Marvel DK book, the popular fan theory has been confirmed into continuity. And for anyone who says that the DK books aren't part of continuity, the Official F.A.Q. recognizes them as a type of handbook: "Dorling Kindersley's Ultimate Guide range, which thus far has covered Spider-Man, ...