Marvel Chronology Project

My problem is in trying to create gaps w/in ASM 538 and ASM 544 to fit ALL of the black costume appearances. I hear you, buddy. Check out ASM 543 for why that's the only viable spot for the black suit appearances.(a major reason being May's hospital room, since that's where she is in the other Spid...

There is at least some gap in time between the OMD ending in ASM 545 and the BND epilogue in ASM 545 because whatever causes the break-up is yet to be revealed.(Contrary to Col_Fury's opinion I believe this HAS to be attributed to Mephisto's involvement.) Well, I'm sure the break-up will be a resul...

Hey Jason, you attributed Paul's response to me To me, so I fixed it for you. The ONLY thing that has "unhappened" because of OMD is the wedding in ASM@ 21. Exactly. All of PAD's FNSM issues happened, Peter beat up Jameson, May was shot, the Back in Black Sensational issues happened, it al...

I’ve read the issue, and here’s what I’m thinking. Pg5-onwards establishes that time has passed from the perspective of the New Avengers. They’re returning from an unseen battle, and Strange mentions the events of WWH as happening in the past. Right there places WWH between A4 37 & the Annual. H...

I totaly missed that when I reviewed those Wolverine issues. But there it is in 58, Dr. Strange tells Wolverine in the astral plane that it's been about a month since he ate a bomb last issue. And here I put those two issues on the same day...

Good catch, Marvologist!

Weren't there preview pages released from Bachalo's BND issues involving the New Avengers, in the Sanctum, with Strange front & center? I don't recall if they were in the Sanctum, but yes. Spider-Man is still with the New Avengers post-OMD, in his classic costume, and Strange & Wolverine we...

For Conners, two possibilities - (1) It's a screw-up by the fill-in artist who didn't bother to reference the character, ignore it 'cause it has no bearing on the plot, (2) He's been playing with the serum again, convinced he had it sorted this time , and proceeded to have a Lizard Attack off-panel...

The problem is that this implies the Ronins were somehow different, when in fact (except for the last one) they were the same, just with different people at the controls. That's a good point. Lemme think... The Shogun Warrior robots also have their own entries. (Full disclosure: I submitted them.) ...

On the other hand, Red Ronin only has one entry despite having had multiple pilots. Unless I'm missing something, Red Ronin is basically just a giant Iron Man suit, right? After quickly flipping through his appearances, I'll suggest: RED RONIN/ROB TAKIGUCHI GZILL 6 GZILL 7 GZILL 8 GZILL 9 GZILL 10 ...

Can I suggest that separate entries be made for the robot Electro and Prof. Zog? I had figured it would eventually come to that over here , but I was holding off until: I suspect we'll see someone else controlling Electro... ...or until Electro became self-aware. I think you're right though, in tha...

Currently: Nick Fury ... WX2 14-FB [SGTF@ 4 (31 - 44)-FB] [SGTF@ 108] M/SPT 31 (3:2 - 3:5)-FB ... Should be: Nick Fury ... WX2 14-FB [SGTF@ 4 (31 - 44)-FB] [SGTF@ 108] M/SPT 31 (3:2 - 3:5)-FB ... Currently: Captain America ... CA:65AS (04/44) M/U 1-FB M/U 1 M/U 2 M/U 3 CA 109 (1 - 6:2)-FB (05/44) TO...

Hey Col_Fury, will you be reviewing The Twelve #0? They have reprints of USA Comics #1 (Rockman), Daring Mystery Comics #2 (Laughing Mask) and Daring Mystery Comics #3 (Phantom Reporter). I already analyzed USA Comics 1-4 , and I plan to analyze Daring Mystery Comics... eventually. It's first Maste...

Hot Dog did that come out wrong! :outtahere: Thanks for responding loki. Obviously, 'the Handbook guys' look at the books. And read them, in detail. It would be impossible to do what you guys do otherwise.(I feel the need to add that I buy the Handbooks, read them, and enjoy them. I love 'em!) I apo...

No response to Sgt. Fury 110. No response to the quote from CA 219's letters page. No response to policy. No response to an offered compromise/solution. Instead... You're reduced to arguing semantics? Oh Noez! He forgot the tick marks! ZOMG! THAT'S you rebuttal? *Sigh* We were having a nice little d...

The Back in Black Handbook says Walter, but Sgt. Fury 110 says Jonah.(not J. Jonah, just Jonah) The online bibliography says 2 May, but What If...? 4(the only What If...? to have 'actually happened!') says 18 April. It looks like the Handbook guys aren't looking at the books, and it looks like you j...